Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

US government considering Google break up


The US government is mulling over a full on break up of Google along product lines in a bid to counter the company’s alleged monopolistic practices.

In the wake of a US court ruling back in August that Google was indeed an anti-competitive monopoly, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) has put forward some proposals to counter the search giant’s influence.

Contained within a new filing is the mention of potential “behavioral and structural remedies” that the DoJ might apply to prevent the company from using Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google Search.

The filing mentions that the dominant Chrome browser comes with Google search set to the default, which “significantly narrows the available channels of distribution and thus disincentivizes the emergence of new competition”.

Amazon’s premium streamer is hiding a great deal in plain sight

Amazon’s premium streamer is hiding a great deal in plain sight

While it’s not part of the Amazon’s deals promotion, the Fire TV Cube is back down to the cheapest price we’ve seen it

It also points out that the Google Play Store is a “must-have on all Android devices”. We’ve all seen the effect that being cut off from the Play Store has and Google’s services has had on Huawei’s smartphone fortunes in recent years.

In effect, the DoJ’s mention of “structural” changes would mean breaking Google up between some the aforementioned core products, likely splitting off the likes of Chrome or Android.

Other proposals would involve blocking Google from paying for search engine priority on Apple’s iPhones, or forcing Google to contribute to educational initiatives to instruct users on the best search engine for them,

Needless to say, Google is not too happy with the severe proposals being made here. It issued a swiftly issued blog post titled ‘DOJ’s radical and sweeping proposals risk hurting consumers, businesses, and developers’.

Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, claims that the DoJ’s proposals “go far beyond the specific legal issues in this case.”

She states that breaking off Chrome or Android from the rest of Google’s services would fundamentally break them. Meanwhile, forcing Google to share a user’s search queries could potentially risk their privacy and security.

The DoJ will propose more detailed proposals by November 20, while Google gets an extra month (til December 20) to put forward its own less stringent suggestions.



You May Also Like